Call Center KPI Dashboard
- Source
- sample-data.csv · 9 rows
Service level
82%
+3.0ppAvg. handle time
6m 12s
-18sFirst-call resolution
74%
+2.1ppCSAT
4.4 / 5
+0.1Call volume by hour
Sample data — yesterday
Call-center metrics are famously gameable — AHT pressure creates transfers, service-level worship creates abandonment blindness. The dashboard below pairs each efficiency metric with the quality metric that keeps it honest.
Service level
82%
+3.0ppAvg. handle time
6m 12s
-18sFirst-call resolution
74%
+2.1ppCSAT
4.4 / 5
+0.1Call volume by hour
Sample data — yesterday
Live render with sample data — upload your own export and this structure regenerates from your numbers, with the computation attached to every figure.
Everything you need to know about using AnalyzeData.
Service level with abandonment, AHT with FCR, and CSAT — efficiency metrics always paired with the quality metric that prevents gaming them.
Export the interval or call-detail report from your platform as CSV, upload, and ask for the daily ops review. Interval math computes from the raw rows.
It is the classic staffing target: 80% of calls answered within 20 seconds. Service level is calls answered inside a threshold divided by calls offered, and 80/20 is the long-standing convention, though you can set your own threshold. It captures staffing correctness in one number, but read it with abandonment rate, which tends to rise before service level reveals a problem.
Because AHT pressure alone just moves work, it does not solve it. Squeeze handle time and agents rush, skip resolution, and create callbacks or transfers that cost more than the seconds saved. Pair AHT with first-call resolution, issues resolved without a follow-up contact, which is its honest partner and the best single quality metric. Manage the outliers and the drivers of AHT, not the average for its own sake.
Upload the export you already have — the dashboard computes itself, verifiably.
Open the workspace